NEWS
1999 NEWS STORIES |
APRIL 1999 THE LATINO COALITION for a Healthy California recently released a report citing that 39 percent of Latinas in the state of California lack adequate health insurance. The health advocacy group released the report citing the lack of health insurance among Latina women. The group hopes to take up the issue with Latino lawmakers in Sacramento. The new chairman of the Senate Health and Human Services Committee, Martha Escutia (D-Commerce), held a hearing on January 29 where the lack of health insurance among Latinas was discussed. One health advocate from Stanislaus County told the Senate committee of a popular family planning program that requires women to take artificial birth control as a condition in order to receive obstetrical care. Legislators admitted that Latinas face a more daunting task in receiving health care because of the Catholic Church's prohibition on the use of artificial birth control. The artificial birth control requirement drew gasps of amazement from Senator Liz Figueroa (D-Fremont) who said, "Oh that's ridiculous." Samantha Philips, director of the Stanislaus County Health Services Agency, did not return the Mission's phone call asking for comment. The working paper for the cardinal's letter (which is intended to allow "for the inclusion of other important voices in the church" besides the priests and bishops) began in October 1997 when "some 500 priests of the Archdiocese of Los Angeles met for their 'Assembly '97' to reflect on their lives and ministry." Taking the priests' reflections as a springboard, the working paper considers three areas: the reflections of the assembled priests, issues unresolved at the Assembly, and how to broaden the conversation about priesthood. The working paper says that the priests at the Assembly "almost unanimously expressed satisfaction with their lives"; that the "original idealism" out of which their priesthood arose, "together with God's call and presence," has held them in their vocation. The priests, says the working paper, perceived that the people wanted them "to be human and present, and to be focused in their celebration of the Liturgy and Sacraments." They saw the Church "as calling them to responsible and productive ministry," although they saw it "in an institutional sense, to be sometimes unduly demanding of them." In contrast to their "predecessors of only one generation ago" who "could have been expected to express their calling as that of seeking perfection, the salvation of souls, and the conversion of sinners," priests today "think of themselves as called to know and experience the presence of God in their lives. Further, they feel called to share that knowledge and experience with those to whom they minister, thus enabling others to discover--through Word and Sacrament--that same presence in their own lives." The clergy, according to the working paper, "spoke of re-defining the role of priest." Their discussion "focused on two issues: first, how to re-think ordained ministry in view of declining numbers of clergy and an increasingly complex Church, and second, how to develop collaborative ministries within the Church." In discussing the development of collaborative ministries, "the priests," said the working paper, "assigned maximum importance to promoting the clustering of parishes and to learning how to identify the gifts and charisma of the laity, as well as to encourage them to develop those gifts. They also took note of their own need of training for a new way and world of Christian ministry, i.e., to re-define their understanding of themselves, the better to accommodate the changes they were proposing." The priests also indicated that they wanted "to accept more responsibility for the poor." In redefining themselves, the priests expressed a desire to move away from administration, which they tended to associate, says the working letter, with "terms such as plant maintenance, personnel supervision, or fundraising." Seeing administration "as lying outside the scope of priestly life and ministry," the clergy, says the working letter, expressed no "understanding of the creative aspects of administration." Among the "Unresolved Issues" was why "priests who say that they are happy" are "not more active in promoting vocations to the priesthood." A disparity exists, says the working letter, "between the high number of points (155) given to forming lay leadership and the relatively few points (36) given to encouraging vocations." "Is there a reluctance," asks the working draft, "to invite others to share in a life [the priests] almost unanimously find fulfilling? This needs to be addressed." According to the working letter, the cardinal's pastoral letter "should be a practical document" and should help the "average parishioner...understand the changes that have taken place in the theology, life, and multicultural reality of the church. It must enable them to see that there needs to be significant changes in the way that ministry is done, including clustering parishes, introducing pastoral associates, identifying, forming, training, and supporting lay ministers.... There must be input from representatives of the laity. We need to hear what they expect of priests, as they must better understand what priests expect from the laity. Ideally, the letter should be a catalyst for dialogue. Again, the process is more important than the final product." On December 30, 1998 Scabrough, along with Catholic Worker Sandi Huckaby, were arrested for pouring oil and blood on the steps of the Federal building in downtown Los Angeles. The Workers were protesting the United States' bombings of Iraq in December. While in jail, Scarbrough was extradited to Nevada to face charges for the fence-cutting action. Joyce Parkhurst surrendered herself to the Tonopah courthouse upon news of Scarbrough's extradition. Thirty-six people from Los Angeles, the Bay Area and Las Vegas traveled to Tonopah to be present at the sentencing. "It is fitting," writes Catholic Worker Eric DeBode in the Agitator, "that Martha's and Joyce's actions have led from the Test Site to the downtown Federal Building in L.A., and then back to Nevada." "Nuclear testing is connected to Iraq," writes DeBode. "The U.S. experimented with 'depleted uranium' shells which were used in battle. Although our government will not admit it, we are engaging in no less than nuclear war against Iraq. Tons of radioactive material have been released into Iraq's environment in solid and, after the explosion, in gas form." The Agitator urges readers to write Nevada judge John Davis at P.O. Box 839, Tonopah, NV 89049 to "protest his punitive sentence." Letters, too, may be sent to Martha Scarbrough and Joyce Parkhurst at: Inmate, c/o Nye County Sheriff, Detention Center, P.O. Box 831, Tonopah, NV 89049. On Friday, February 5, Roger Cardinal Mahony sent a letter to Davis begging clemency for Siripongs. As quoted in the Times Mahony asked Davis to "consider the moral and ethical issues raised by the use of the death penalty." Alluding perhaps to the criteria for the use of the death penalty laid down by John Paul II in his encyclical Evangelium Vitae, Mahony argued that commuting Siripong's sentence to "life without possibility of parole" would not only assure "substantial safeguards for society," but would level "a grave punishment against the accused." The cardinal also told Davis that the death penalty is "a tool by which vengeance and revenge can be exacted and political advantage can be maintained." Siripong's attorneys argued that their client had shown remorse for his crime. They also argued that there is evidence that Siripongs did not commit the murders. Though he had admitted that he committed robbery at the Garden Grove market, Siripongs had always denied that he had committed the murders. According to the Times, Davis, in his ten-page decision, wrote: "This is a plea for mercy by a man sentenced to forfeit his life for capital crimes...However, it is also a plea by innocent victims, their families, and friends to carry out a sentence imposed by a jury.... Remorse is not sufficient to satisfy a capital sentence for double murder." Davis wrote that Siripong's claims that he did not commit the murder "have been considered time and again by many courts over the 16-year history of this case," which have decided that they were without merit. Siripongs was executed February 9 by lethal injection. Archdiocesan attorney John McNicholas has claimed that the archdiocese did not cover up Llanos' alleged abuse. McNicholas said that hearing of the allegations in 1994, the archdiocese removed Llanos from his ministry. Llanos, who served in parishes in Long Beach, Santa Ana, Covina and Los Angeles, committed suicide in 1997. Initially, said the Times, Mahony paid for the alleged victims' therapy, but stopped paying when they filed a lawsuit. Archdiocesan spokesman, Father Gregory Coiro, according to the Times, said the archdiocese has no obligation to the alleged victims. "If an individual who represents the church has done something wrong," said Coiro, "it doesn't mean it's the church's responsibility." The California Catholic Conference's spokeswoman Carol Hogan said the Church opposes the Aroner bill. "The Catholic Church believes in the sanctity of life from conception to natural death," she said. For more information, contact the California Pro-Life Council, 2306 J Street, Suite 200, Sacramento, CA 95816; phone: (916) 442-8315; e-mail: prolife@californiaprolife.org. "One notable difference between Seton and these other organizations," said Gallagher, "is that we have a full curriculum from kindergarten through the 12th grade and we are accredited by the Northwest Association of Schools and Colleges." Gallagher added that "the Church says that parents may choose the means and institutes to educate their children. Home education is one of these, and Seton Home Study School is effective for many Catholic parents." On February 3 Seton completed the Private School Affidavit process and the affidavit was entered into the data base of the Los Angeles County Office of Education. For more information, email at setonca@networkone.net, or call 661-948-8881. |